<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AuctioneerTech - Latest Comments in Your website is more important than social networking</title><link>http://auctioneertech.disqus.com/</link><description>Technology, auctions and auctioneers</description><atom:link href="https://auctioneertech.disqus.com/your_website_is_more_important_than_social_networking/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:03:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Your website is more important than social networking</title><link>http://www.auctioneertech.com/your-website-is-more-important-than-social-networking/#comment-20042864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant. My one point of difference is while you are absolutely on target re: Facebook, LinkedIn etc., Twitter seems to have evolved into a different animal for two reasons: (1) It doesn't do as good a job of enabling interactive conversations that other people can easily follow, and (b) It can reach a much broader audience -- far beyond your followers. (I now see Twitter followers as almost irrelevant and don't do anything to add them.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those two Twitter traits are making it less personal by its nature, so people there now follow topics/hashes more than people, and that makes outright business promotion (e.g. auction announcements) more acceptable. If somebody's got a search set on #duluth, they don't much care about the poster, just whether it interests them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carl Carter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>